When Islamic finance assets of $5.99 trillion are included, the total market stands at nearly $9 trillion, making it one of the most significant and fastest-growing economic systems in the world.
The SGIE report assesses how countries are positioned to capture opportunities within the Islamic economy relative to their economic scale via the GIEI (Global Islamic Economy Indicators) index. The index comprises 52 metrics organised across five core components spanning the aforementionedseven sectors of the Islamic economy.
Scores are normalised to ensure comparability across economies of different sizes, meaning the ranking reflects ecosystem quality and coordination rather than absolute market volume.
Below are the 10 strongest Islamic economy ecosystems in the world, ranked by their 2025 GIEI scores.
INDICATOR SCORES BREAKDOWN FOR TOP 10 COUNTRIES
1. Malaysia
GIEI Score: 186.1
Malaysia retains its number one position for the twelfth consecutive year, ranking first in halal food, Islamic finance, and halal pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.
The country's ecosystem is anchored by the depth and global integration of its halal infrastructure: a fully digital certification system (MYeHALAL), expanded auditor capacity, and formal adoption of OIC/SMIIC halal standards for global alignment. In Islamic finance,
Malaysia recorded a 12% increase in assets and a 13% rise in Islamic fund value, with PNB's $300 million sukuk issuance among the headline transactions.
2. United Arab Emirates
GIEI Score: 137.5
The UAE climbs from the fourth to second slot, ranking in the top three across all six sectors. The country recorded the most active Islamic economy investment environment globally in 2025, with 94 transactions spanning venture capital, private equity, and M&A, and registered the second-highest FDI inflows among OIC countries at $45.6 billion.
Islamic finance expanded through a government Treasury Sukuk programme accessible from 4,000 Emirati dirhams, while digital innovation advanced through Shariah-compliant Bitcoin trading.
3. Saudi Arabia
GIEI Score: 107.9
Saudi Arabia ranks third overall, with particular strength in Islamic finance, halal food, and Muslim-friendly travel. Islamic finance assets grew 18%, outstanding sukuk rose 27%, and Islamic fund value increased 46%.
Tourism infrastructure is scaling rapidly, with Riyadh Air's inaugural international flights and $773 million in new tourism development fund projects signalling the kingdom's ambitions as a global halal travel destination.
4. Indonesia
GIEI Score: 96.0
Indonesia ranks fourth overall and first in modest fashion, with top-three positions in halal food, media and recreation. A landmark development this year was the elevation of the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency to cabinet level, giving it a direct mandate over halal certification, accreditation, and export facilitation.
Indonesia has also expanded its halal connectivity through 92 mutual recognition agreements across 24 countries and stands as the third-largest FDI recipient among OIC countries at $24.2 billion.
With Indonesia also being the world's largest Muslim-majority country, its domestic halal food market alone stood at $165.4 billion in 2024.
5. Bahrain
GIEI Score: 76.0
Bahrain holds its fifth-place position, ranking first in Muslim-friendly travel and fifth in Islamic finance. A small economy by OIC standards, Bahrain punches above its weight through regulatory excellence: the kingdom has been ranked first globally for Islamic finance regulatory frameworks, and its central bank's new Shariah-compliant stablecoin framework signals continued leadership in financial innovation.
Tourism is an expanding second pillar, with inbound visitors reaching nearly 15 million in 2024 — a near-20% year-on-year increase.
6. Türkiye
GIEI Score: 69.1
Türkiye ranks sixth, with its strongest performances in Muslim-friendly travel and halal food. The country is the third-largest modest fashion consumer market globally at $54.3 billion and the top halal pharmaceuticals consumer market among OIC countries at $11.2 billion.
Domestically, Türkiye's participation finance sector continues to deepen, with Istanbul increasingly positioned as a regional hub. On the investment side, Trendyol Go attracted a $700 million deal, the largest e-commerce transaction in the Islamic economy in 2025.
7. Pakistan
GIEI Score: 64.7
Pakistan enters the top 10 for the first time in the halal food GIEI sub-ranking and ranks seventh overall, reflecting rapid ecosystem maturation.
The country is home to the world's second-largest Muslim population and a fast-expanding Islamic banking sector that now represents a significant share of total banking assets.
Pakistan's media and recreation sector is also a notable strength, driven by the country's large and digitally engaged Muslim consumer base.
8. Iran
GIEI Score: 63.5
Iran returns to the top 10, driven primarily by the scale of its Islamic finance sector — the largest by asset volume globally at $2.24 trillion — and its modest fashion consumer market, where spending of $59.2 billion places it first in the world.
9. Kuwait
GIEI Score: 55.8
Kuwait's banking sector is among the most Islamically penetrated in the GCC, with Islamic banks holding a substantial share of total sector assets.
Kuwait's Muslim-friendly travel sector is also a source of strength, supported by significant outbound spending — $14.7 billion in 2024 — making it the fifth-largest Muslim travel consumer market globally.
Investment activity is concentrated in Islamic finance platforms and consumer-facing digital ventures.
10. Jordan
GIEI Score: 52.0
Jordan benefits from a mature Islamic banking sector, active sukuk activity, and a well-regarded regulatory environment.
Jordan is also an active halal pharmaceuticals exporter within the OIC bloc, ranking 15th globally for intra-OIC pharmaceutical exports.
Its position in the top 10 reflects consistent, broad-based performance across the GIEI's sub-indicators rather than dominance in any single sector.
Qatar has focused on reviving and developing Syria’s utility and aviation landscape. Last year, Syria signed a $7 billion deal with Qatar's UCC Holding-led consortium to add 5,000 megawatts to the national grid. The United Nations Development Programme estimates that Syria’s energy production has fallen by more than 80% from pre-war levels and that more than 70% of plants and transmission lines are damaged. Syria also inked a $4 billion deal with a consortium of companies led by UCC Holding to redevelop Damascus International Airport.
The UAE is also viewing Syria strategically to strengthen trade networks beyond the Strait of Hormuz and secure a greater regional role. Mohamed Alabbar, the co-founder of e-commerce platform Noon, is planning to invest up to $18 billion in Syria in addition to launching an e-commerce platform, he announced in May.
Local port authorities are increasing their investment and operational footprint to support enhanced trade flows and long-term economic growth. Dubai’s DP World signed an $800-million preliminary agreement to develop the port of Tartous, while Abu Dhabi's AD Ports Group purchased a $22 million stake in a container terminal in Syria's main commercial port, responsible for 95% of the country’s container volumes.
From January 2025 through February 2026, the GCC used a calibrated program of financial and political support that helped stabilize the Levant, writes Middle Eastern expert Norman Roule.
“Saudi Arabia actively shaped the political and economic architecture of Syria’s reintegration into the Arab world; the UAE’s investment will enhance the Levant’s future as a strategic shipping center; Qatar combined solvency support with energy-centric statecraft.”
However, despite all the money pouring in, the country’s reconstruction costs are disproportionately high, tenfold the size of its 2024 nominal GDP, according to World Bank’s last October estimates.
Moreso, the country will need $215 billion to reconstruct what thirteen years of conflict have destroyed, including $75 billion for residential buildings, $59 billion for non-residential structures, and $82 billion for infrastructure, according to the World Bank's Syria Physical Damage and Reconstruction Assessment 2011-2024 report.
Best estimate for reconstruction costs by governorate as of December 31, 2024 (US$m) Source: Syria Physical Damage and Reconstruction Assessment 2011-2024 report
Real GDP declined nearly 53% between 2010 and 2022 while nominal GDP contracted from $67.5 billion in 2011 to an estimated $21.4 billion in 2024.
“The estimates of reconstruction costs are about 10 times nominal 2024 GDP, reflecting both the extensive damage caused by the conflict as well as the years of massive economic contraction. The disruptions due to the conflict and to economic sanctions have also led to a reliance on imports, depletion of foreign reserves, and heavily constrained fiscal resources,” the World Bank report read.
Furthermore, despite the surge in investment interest, regional and international investors agree that the investment and regulatory regime need to be improved, Beth Morrissey, managing partner at Kleiman International Consultants, Inc., tells Salaam Gateway.
“At the moment, investors note lack of transparency and predictability, and Syria's neighbours are well-placed to help the country. We understand the existing legal/regulatory environment, judicial system and current investment laws were key discussions at the May UAE-Syrian business forum. Already, Saudi is assisting with a foreign investment protection framework and has indicated investment will begin to flow. Gulf investors have noted that decision-making is still centralized at the top of the government due to lack of existing institutions.”
“There is also some concern about last June's Investment Law 114, which amended but did not replace an earlier law, as it grants permanent concessions to investors, preserves the centralized system and could, in the future, imperil Syria's finances as, for example, export-oriented industries receive income tax reductions of up to 80 percent.”
I. Introduction
The alarming rise in global public debt demands innovative, long-term financing solutions. For the Global South, the “Looming Debt Crisis” highlights the need for transformative approaches beyond temporary relief. Among these, GDP-linked bonds are emerging as a promising pathway for sustainable development financing.
First proposed in the 1980s and gaining renewed support after successive debt crises, GDP-linked debt aligns repayment with economic performance. Supported by leading economists and the IMF, this model offers a sustainable way to manage debt and promote sustainable growth.
Islamic finance principles, rooted in risk-sharing, make GDP-linked Sukuk a natural fit for development finance. By tying obligations to GDP, these Sukuk provide equitable and resilient solutions that align with Islamic ethics.
This article explores the potential value of this model and the role of blockchain technology in supporting implementation. Blockchain ensures secure and transparent tracking of economic data, while smart contracts enhance the efficiency of execution.
II. Structure
The coupon and principal in GDP-linked bonds rise and fall in proportion to the issuing country’s nominal GDP. Robert Shiller has called these instruments “GDP shares” as they allow governments to raise funds while linking repayments to the resources of the economy. In this model, sovereign obligations adjust in line with economic performance.
Shiller has argued that replacing part of conventional national debt with claims linked to economic output could help governments better manage financial obligations, reduce the risk of future crises, and potentially lower borrowing costs over time.
Interest in the indexing of debt servicing to GDP first emerged in the 1980s and received fresh support after frequent debt crises. The idea was supported by several distinguished economists, including Joseph Stiglitz and has also received favorable consideration from the IMF.
III. Features
In their Foreword to the book Sovereign GDP-Linked Bonds: Rationale and Design (2018), Andy Haldane of the Bank of England and Maurice Obstfeld of the IMF, note the following appealing features of GDP-linked bonds:
They can provide the issuing government with debt relief when growth weakens and tax receipts decline.
Investors gain a route out of being locked into low-interest rates through exposure to the real economy while the debt-stabilizing effects of issuance mean default risks become more remote.
They also allow risk to be shared across borders more efficiently, ultimately reducing the need for sovereign bailouts and limiting moral hazard.
The “automatic stabilizer” role of GDP-linked instruments reduces the need to resort to procyclical policies. When economic growth slows, GDP indexation can ease debt pressures, lower the probability of default, and help reduce financial distress and rising unemployment.
In periods of low GDP growth, the GDP-linked instruments can reduce debt-servicing costs and reduce the need for more borrowing or taxes. This would help to smooth the tax rate and reduce uncertainty for consumption and investment. Conversely, higher payments during stronger GDP growth may discourage governmental overspending. As a result, sovereigns may gain greater short-term budget flexibility while maintaining long-term solvency and resilience to financial turmoil.
A key element for the success of GDP-linked bonds, Griffith-Jones remarks is to identify the proper set of investors interested in this kind of bond. Given their equity-like features, they may appeal to equity investors as well as those interested in hybrid instruments. Moreover, since GDP-linked bonds are directly linked to the overall economy, they have elements of Development Impact Bonds.
Arshadur Rahman of the Bank of England suggests issuing GDP-linked Sukuk. To the extent that GDP is correlated with government income, then the GDP-linked Sukuk will represent a form of partnership between the government and investors. From a Shari’ah perspective, this structure potentially emulates musharakah arrangements.
IV. Blockchain networks
A serious challenge for GDP-linked instruments is the reliability of the data on which investors’ returns depend. Conventional economic statistics rely on samples intended to represent the entire economy, but these may create inaccuracies requiring revision in subsequent releases. In addition, given the centralized nature of the process, data are exposed to the risks of manipulation and interference. These challenges limit the appeal of GDP-linked instruments to investors.
Issuing GDP-linked papers requires establishing an effective system for collecting verifiable and consistent data. Blockchain technology can be very helpful in this regard. This can be done as follows:
1. A group of blockchain networks of consumers, producers, wholesalers, and retailers, among others, can be established with the verifiable identities of each member of each network. Each network would be dedicated to a particular sector of the economy.
2. Data from sector-specific networks can be aggregated into a national blockchain network, providing a comprehensive and real-time estimate of GDP.
3. This unified approach ensures consistency and avoids duplication or gaps in data collection.
4. Members of each network could report:
a. Current price of a pre-identified set of goods and services within their respective sectors.
b. Expected prices over defined future periods.
5. Reported data are verified by members following blockchain verification and consensus algorithms. The IsDB Institute developed the patented “Proof of Use” algorithm as a more economically sustainable alternative to Proof of Work.
6. Members could be rewarded tokens issued by the networks’ sponsors such as the central banks or relevant authorities.
This process would help ensure that the collected data are transparent, observable, easy to compute, and non-manipulative. Since the technology requires only an internet connection and smartphones, the data collection process requires minimal upfront costs.
The Blockchain network can be used to collect various kinds of data including indicators related to financial inclusion and broader development outcomes.
Digital GDP-linked Sukuk could be issued and distributed through the Blockchain network. These Digital Sukuks would represent a tokenized form of the Sukuk certificates and their underlying contractual terms.
Smart contracts can be used to link the periodic Sukuk payments with the data collection network. Using blockchain on both sides, data collection and Sukuk issuance are likely to make the entire process seamless, transparent, and efficient. This allows the Sukuk to be accessible to a wider range of investors, particularly retail investors.
V. Issues and challenges
While the Digital GDP-linked Sukuk might be conceptually appealing, there are many issues that need to be addressed before implementation. For example:
Managing the blockchain networks would be demanding and may involve some centralized control. Although the risks of manipulation are much lower than the centralized approach, some risks remain.
Developing countries, which stand to benefit most from GDP-linked Sukuk, may face challenges in implementing and maintaining blockchain networks due to limited infrastructure and technical expertise.
Ensuring that all economic actors, including those in remote or underserved areas, can participate in the blockchain network will require extensive outreach and capacity building.
GDP-linked Sukuk are suitable for most middle-income countries with promising growth prospects.
Very-low-income countries could issue sector-specific Sukuk tied to growth in sectors such as agriculture, mining, or oil & gas.
Although the GDP-linked Sukuk of a single country may carry higher risk, a diversified portfolio of such instruments could reduce risks.
VI. Conclusion
Islamic finance is, at its core, a risk-sharing system with the capacity to absorb and manage various economic risks. This will not make the economy risk-free, but it will make these risks manageable and self-stabilizing. However, when debt becomes excessive, these risks can become destabilising.
GDP-linked Sukuk offers an innovative approach to sustainable financing by aligning debt obligations with a country's economic performance. This instrument can help curb excessive debt accumulation while promoting a more stable and inclusive growth, reflecting the risk-sharing principles of Islamic finance.
Author: Dr. Sami Al Suwailem Acting Director General, IsDBI
This article is produced and sponsored by IsDBI. It was first published in the State of the Global Islamic Economy 2025/26 report produced by DinarStandard. The report can be downloaded from here.
In the close of the 2025 calendar year, global leaders gathered for what many hope will be remembered as the beginning of the end for one of humanity's most dreaded diseases. The occasion marked a pivotal moment in the decades-long battle against polio, as international partners announced a collective commitment of $1.9 billion to advance eradication efforts and protect hundreds of millions of children worldwide.
The global pledging event, titled "Investing in Humanity: Uniting to End Polio," was hosted by the Mohamed bin Zayed Foundation for Humanity in partnership with the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI). Among those in attendance were His Highness Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Gates Foundation, World Health Organization Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and government ministers from affected nations.
The scale of the announcement was a peek into the severity of the situation, and its eventual outcome now hinges on whether these global health efforts succeed or fail. It was a story that shines a light on institutions that operate at the intersection of trust, culture, and credibility. Among them was the Islamic Food & Nutrition Council of America (IFANCA), whose $4 million pledge is a critical investment during this last mile moment, where every dollar matters. In the final stretch to end polio for good, partnership, influence and credibility remain as important as funding, ensuring communities have the trust and support needed to finish the job.
A disease on the brink
The significance of this funding announcement cannot be overstated. Wild poliovirus, which once paralyzed hundreds of thousands of children annually, is now endemic in only two countries: Afghanistan and Pakistan. The world stands at what public health experts describe as 99.9% of the way toward complete eradication. That in itself is a milestone that seemed impossible just decades ago.
“Polio eradication is not just a health priority for Gilgit-Baltistan; it is a national responsibility for Pakistan, especially after the recent case in Diamer (one of the regions in the north of Pakistan in Gilgit Baltistan) reminded us that the virus still threatens our children,”said Dr. Mubashir Hassan, Director Health Planning & Procurement, Gilgit-Baltistan.
“As one of the last two endemic countries alongside Afghanistan, Global stakeholders must sustain unwavering immunization efforts to protect every child and fulfil their global commitment to a polio-free world,” he added.
Public health professionals often describe eradication as a paradox: the closer you get to zero, the harder every remaining step becomes. Early gains are relatively straightforward. The final cases are not. The window for action is narrow, and the stakes are enormous. Complete eradication would save the world more than $33 billion by 2100 compared with the costs of managing recurring outbreaks indefinitely.
The latest commitments include approximately $1.2 billion in new pledges, which reduces the remaining funding gap for GPEI's 2022-2029 strategy to $440 million. These resources will accelerate vital efforts to reach 370 million children each year with polio vaccines while simultaneously strengthening health systems in affected countries to protect against other preventable diseases.
The "last mile" of polio eradication runs through regions shaped by conflict, political instability, misinformation, and deep-rooted mistrust of external intervention. In such environments, technical capacity alone is insufficient. The simple fact is that vaccines do not fail because they are ineffective; they fail because they are refused, feared, or misunderstood.
This is where IFANCA's role becomes especially significant.
IFANCA and the politics of trust
IFANCA is best known globally for its work in halal certification, which lies at the cross-section of religion and modern scientific methods, ensuring that food, pharmaceuticals, and consumer products meet Islamic dietary and ethical standards. But its influence extends well beyond certification. For decades, IFANCA has functioned as a bridge between scientific institutions and Muslim communities, translating technical standards into culturally credible assurances. That same credibility now matters profoundly in global health.
At the Abu Dhabi pledging event, IFANCA reaffirmed its commitment to polio eradication, framing its contribution not simply as financial support, but as part of a broader moral obligation to protect children. "Supporting children and protecting the most vulnerable is central to IFANCA's mission," said IFANCA President Dr. Muhammad Munir Chaudry, adding that "the last mile is the hardest, but we stand with GPEI partners and donors to finish the job".
The wording is telling, reflecting an understanding that eradication is not just a logistical challenge, but a social one. In communities where vaccination campaigns have historically been met with suspicion, institutions like IFANCA, which have built significant trust through their previous work, play a crucial role in facilitating public health efforts. Their support signals that immunization is not only medically sound, but ethically acceptable and religiously compatible.
Why IFANCA's contribution punches above its weight
Beyond its financial contributions, the additional value of IFANCA's involvement lies in where and how it operates. Polio eradication efforts increasingly depend on reaching communities where external authority, whether governmental or international, is often viewed with skepticism. In such contexts, faith-based institutions often enjoy levels of trust that governments and NGOs do not. Their participation can determine whether a vaccination campaign is tolerated, embraced, or rejected outright.
“We are closer than ever to ending polio for good, but the final mile demands not only resources, but trust and partnership,” said Michael J. Nyenhuis, President and CEO of UNICEF USA. “UNICEF USA has seen that vaccines can only save lives when communities have confidence in the institutions delivering them. The leadership of trusted organizations like IFANCA reminds us that protecting children from preventable disease is a shared moral responsibility. Together, if we stay the course, we can reach the finish line.”
By standing publicly alongside GPEI, WHO, UNICEF USA, and major philanthropic actors, IFANCA reinforces a critical message: that ending polio is compatible with, not in conflict with, religious values.
A broader shift in global health
The Abu Dhabi pledging moment also reflected a broader transformation in how global health initiatives are financed and delivered. The budget of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative faces an expected 30% cut in 2026, part of a broader pullback from foreign aid by wealthy nations. The United States has withdrawn from the World Health Organization, creating uncertainty about future funding commitments. Other major donor governments, including Germany and the United Kingdom, have also implemented cuts to international aid budgets.
While traditional donor governments remain important, the Abu Dhabi pledging moment revealed a deeper structural shift within global health itself. As geopolitical tensions rise and foreign aid commitments become less predictable, the architecture of global health response is evolving away from reliance on a narrow set of state actors toward a broader coalition that includes philanthropies, regional foundations, civil society organizations, and faith-based institutions. This evolution reflects not simply diversification, but adaptation to a more complex risk environment.
Seen through this lens, the growing role of organizations like IFANCA is less about supporting individual medical interventions and more about strengthening global health security. Public health crises increasingly unfold in environments shaped by political instability, cultural sensitivities, and distrust of external authority. In such contexts, success depends not only on scientific capability but on the presence of trusted intermediaries capable of bridging global systems with local communities. IFANCA’s longstanding credibility within Muslim communities positions it as one of these stabilizing actors—reducing friction and helping ensure that international health initiatives can operate effectively in culturally complex settings.
This shift represents a recalibration of how global health challenges are addressed. Rather than framing success solely in terms of funding levels or technical delivery, the emerging model emphasizes resilience: the ability of health systems to function amid uncertainty, contested narratives, and evolving geopolitical pressures. In this environment, partnerships founded on trust and cultural fluency become essential components of the global health security infrastructure.
This funding environment makes the Abu Dhabi commitments all the more critical. In response to budgetary pressures, GPEI partners plan to focus resources more strategically on surveillance and vaccination in areas with the highest risk of polio transmission. The approach reflects both pragmatism and determination—doing more with less while maintaining momentum toward eradication.
Whether that time is used effectively will depend not only on how funds are deployed, but on who is trusted to deliver them. In that equation, IFANCA's involvement is strategic. The $1.9 billion pledged in Abu Dhabi represents renewed commitment at a moment when global cooperation faces significant headwinds. It demonstrates that even in an era of constrained budgets and competing priorities, the world can still rally around goals that transcend borders and benefit all of humanity.
As Dr. Chaudry noted, the last mile is the hardest. It is also the most revealing of priorities, of partnerships, and of whether the global community truly understands what eradication requires. If the world does finish the job, institutions like IFANCA will have played a role that history may not fully quantify but should not forget. The end is in sight. With sustained commitment and the resources pledged in Abu Dhabi, the world may soon declare victory in one of the longest and most consequential battles in public health history.
This article is produced and sponsored by IFANCA. It was first published in the State of the Global Islamic Economy 2025/26 report produced by DinarStandard. The report can be downloaded from here.
We're growing — and want you to be part of our journey
Salaam Gateway has always been your home for independent, in-depth coverage of the global
Islamic economy. To help us go deeper and do more, we're introducing a membership tier for
our premium reports and insights — so we can produce more of everything you've come to love.