Home / News

Featured News


All Other News
OIC Economies
Can Iran economically sustain a protracted war? 

Iran’s fragile economy is under siege and at risk of significant economic deteoriation in case of a protracted conflict.  

The country’s projected growth for this year - which the International Monetary Fund’s October placed at 1.1% last October - has now plunged into the red territory. The fund foresees Iran’s GDP to contract by 6.1% this year, together with an upward inflation revision of over 13 percentage points. 

Grim estimates and prophecies are pouring in from multiple quarters. Official figures suggest that the country has suffered around $270 billion in direct and indirect losses in the first few weeks of the conflict with the US and Israel – more than half of its 2024 GDP. Iran’s central bank has reportedly estimated that reconstructing the war-ravaged economy could take more than a decade.

Internet blackouts, which have continued since the start of the war, entered their 62nd day on April 30, according to NetBlocks, a digital governance and connectivity tracker. Back in January, Sattar Hashemi, Iran's Information and Communication Technology Minister, estimated that internet outages carry a daily cost of $38 million (50 trillion rials). By that measure, the shutdown alone has costed the economy at least $2.2 billion. 

Iranian rial has experience significant depreciation, declining from 1.35 million to $1 on January 1 to 1.72 million to $1 on February 28, the first day of the war, before rising to 1.46 million to $1 on March 12, according to Bonbast.com, a website that tracks live exchange rates in Iran’s free market.  

“The Iranian economy is under immense pressure. The conflict has heavily impacted productive capacity and Iran’s latest offer to open the strait and defer the conversation over the nuclear programme suggests that the US blockade is also causing real economic pain,” Vladimir Gorshkov, a macro policy strategist at State Street Investment Management told Salaam Gateway. 

The Muslim-majority country with around 90 million residents has been contending with grave economic challenges since before the conflict. Economic sanctions, political instability and fiscal deficit have exacerbated the country’s plight over several years. Prior to the conflict, the IMF had forecasted Iran’s gross government debt to spike to 36.4% of its GDP in 2026 and to 39.3% by the end of the decade. Meanwhile, inflation more than doubled from 20.6% in 1980 to 42.4% in 2025. 

“Iran entered this war after years of sustained economic pressure. Sanctions, isolation, and structural weaknesses have already produced a fragile economy. The war has intensified these pressures, but it has not represented a fundamentally new shock,” writes Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute.

But Iran is now in unchartered economic territory, he adds. “Each additional month that the war continues could set the Iranian economy back by more than five years, reflecting the compounding impact on capital stock and productivity.” 

Mass layoffs have complicated Iran’s socio-economic landscape further with one million people having reportedly lost their jobs. Threat of privations linger as the war could push an additional 3.5 million to 4.1 million people below the poverty threshold, burgeoning the pool of 32.7 million people already surviving below the $8.3 poverty level per day, according to the United Nations development programme (UNDP). 

“Iran entered the crisis from a relatively narrow position within the upper-middle-income country category, with income levels only marginally above the World Bank threshold,” the UNDP said. 

“The additional impact of the current crisis is expected to intensify this downward trajectory and raise the likelihood that Iran could transition into lower-middle-income country status in the near-term.”

The ‘toll’ reality 
An economically redeeming feature for Iran would be to gain control of and monetize the Strait of Hormuz, a reality which has begun to shape up, with Iranian officials confirming the receipt of the first toll revenue earlier this month. All ships transiting the route must pay the fee in Iranian rial, Iran’s Tasnim news agency cited Hamidreza Hajibabaei, the parliament’s deputy speaker, as saying. 

Global bodies have not validated Iran’s right to securing payment from transiting vessels. Arsenio Dominguez, secretary-general of the International Maritime Organization said that there was no legal basis for any country to introduce payments or impose tolls, fees or any discriminatory conditions on international straits. 

The Strait of Hormuz is a natural waterway which operates under the directives established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which prohibits charging vessels for passage. Article 26 of the convention suggests that charges may be levied upon a foreign ship passing through territorial sea as payment only for “specific services rendered to the ship”.

Gorshkov suggests that the transit toll would only work if there were an institutionalised system for collection in place as it could not operate on an ad hoc basis in peacetime. 

“A toll on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz would be a new source of revenue but it doesn’t automatically follow that the overall government revenue would increase. Moreover, it’s likely to be the case that much of that flow will be captured by very narrow interests so it is hard to see how the economy at large would significantly benefit.”

The snag of storage 
Iran’s oil production and subsequent exports are also in the balance given the United Nation’s naval blockade. The country churned out approximately 3.68 million and 3.63 million barrels per day of crude oil in February and March, respectively, according to an International Energy Agency report published this month.

Iranian exports were also on a par with pre-war levels in March, accounting for over 70% of an average 2.3 million barrels of daily flows that transited the strait last month. However, the naval blockade enforced mid-April means that most of Iranian exports will now need to be stored. 

Scott Bessent, US Treasury Secretary, claimed in a post on X on April 21 that the storage capacity at Kharg Island would be full “in a matter of days” and that the “fragile Iranian oil wells will be shut in”. 

“Constraining Iran’s maritime trade directly targets the regime’s primary revenue lifelines,” he added.

Kharg Island is a small island northwest of the port of Bushehr and serves as a terminal for nearly all of Iran’s oil exports.  

Iran has also sustained significant damage to its petrochemical facilities, notably at Shiraz and Mahshahr. Israel struck Iran’s South Pars field, a critical energy asset that supplies 80% of Iran’s natural gas. Natural gas generates 79% of the country's electricity, primarily used for heating, cooking, lighting and other uses, according to IEA. 

“Israel’s attack on the South Pars Gas Field damaged infrastructure indispensable for the survival of Iranians,” said Joey Shea, senior Saudi Arabia and UAE researcher at Human Rights Watch.  

“Attacks on key oil and energy infrastructure have foreseeable knock-on economic impacts that could prove harmful to millions of people.” 

OIC Economies
Saudi GDP eases 2.8% in Q1 amid Iran conflict

Saudi Arabia’s real gross domestic product increased 2.8% year-on-year in the first quarter, according to flash government estimates issued on Thursday. 

Non-oil activities rose 2.8% while oil-related activities grew 2.3% year-on-year, data by the General Authority for Statistics (GASTAT) suggested. 

However, seasonally adjusted real GDP for the first quarter decreased 1.5% on the previous quarter, driven by a 7.2% decline in oil activities, as the implications of the Iran-US war come into play. Government and non-oil activities grew 0.8% and 0.2% respectively. 

“Oil activities were the main contributor to the decline in seasonally adjusted real GDP, -1.7 (percentage points). Non-oil activities and government activities each contributed 0.1 (percentage points),” the report added. 

Gulf oil exporters directly affected by the war face steep downward revisions of up to 15 percentage points this year. The International Monetary Fund has lowered its GDP growth prediction for the kingdom for this year and next. 

The Saudi economy is now expected to expand 3.1 percent this year, down 0.9 percent from the IMF’s last review in October, and 4.5 percent in 2027, up 1.3% from its October’s forecast. 

On balance, Saudi Arabia is assessed to be less sensitive to price increase versus decline in volumes compared to other GCC economies such as Kuwait, the fund said in its latest review. Hence, a 10% increase in oil prices or a 10% decline in export volumes will impact the current account by slightly more than 1 percentage point.

Saudi Arabia activated its East-West Crude Pipeline at full capacity for the first time in its 40-year history in the wake of the US-Iran conflict. The petroline - that runs 1,201 kilometres connecting the Abqaiq oil field in the eastern province to Yanbu on the Red Sea coast, was built during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. 

Saudi Aramco confirmed last March that it had increased the pipeline’s capacity to seven million barrels a day. Exactly a year later, the petroline reached its full operational capacity. 
 

OIC Economies
UAE to exit OPEC, citing shift as Iran conflict disrupts oil markets

The United Arab Emirates will leave OPEC next month, its government said on Tuesday, ending decades of membership as it seeks greater flexibility to increase oil production during a period of geopolitical tension and market disruption linked to the Iran conflict.

The UAE, a member of the group since 1967 through Abu Dhabi, said the decision aligns with its long-term economic strategy and plans to expand energy investment. The move comes as oil markets face volatility and supply constraints, including disruptions to shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a key transit route for global energy supplies.

“The U.A.E.’s decision to exit from OPEC reflects a policy-driven evolution aligned with long-term market fundamentals,” Energy Minister Suhail al-Mazrouei said in a social media post. “We thank OPEC and its member countries for decades of constructive cooperation.”

In a statement published by WAM, the government said leaving the group would provide greater “flexibility” and support its “long-term strategic and economic vision.” Officials added that constraints on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz mean the immediate market impact of the decision is likely to be limited.

The departure is expected to take effect on Friday and includes withdrawal from both OPEC and its wider alliance, OPEC+. The move reduces the group’s production capacity at a time when it has been managing supply to stabilise prices.

Before the current conflict, the UAE was producing about 3.6 million barrels of oil per day, accounting for roughly 12% of OPEC’s output, according to the International Energy Agency. Analysts say its exit could weaken the group’s ability to influence global markets over time.

Oil prices have risen sharply since the escalation of the Iran conflict, with Brent crude reaching as high as $119.50 a barrel. Prices were up 3.4%  on Tuesday at around $111.67.

The decision also highlights growing differences between the UAE and Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s leading member. The two countries have diverged on regional strategy and energy policy in recent years.

Tensions have intensified during the conflict with Iran. The UAE has faced repeated missile and drone attacks and has voiced dissatisfaction with the response from regional organisations. 

The UAE’s exit also aligns with broader criticism of OPEC from Donald Trump, who has accused the group of inflating oil prices and linked US security support for Gulf states to energy costs.

Despite leaving the group, UAE officials said the country would continue to increase production gradually, in line with demand and market conditions.

OIC Economies
Middle East markets dip as investors monitor Iran developments

Middle East stock markets closed lower on Monday as rising tensions between the United States and Iran unsettled investors, amid concerns that a fragile ceasefire could collapse and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz would persist.

Regional sentiment weakened after reports that Tehran rejected further negotiations with Washington, while the seizure of an Iranian cargo vessel by the U.S. added to uncertainty ahead of the ceasefire’s expected expiry.

Dubai’s main index fell 2.1%, ending a four-session rally, led by declines in property and transport stocks. Emaar Properties dropped 2.3%, while Salik Company fell 2.9%. Air Arabia closed 3% lower.

In Abu Dhabi, the benchmark index declined 0.8%, with Aldar Properties down 2.7%.

Saudi Arabia’s index lost 0.9%, weighed by a 1.2% fall in Al Rajhi Bank, while Saudi Aramco ended flat after early gains.

Elsewhere, Qatar’s index slipped 0.4%, with Qatar Islamic Bank declining 1.8%. Egypt’s benchmark index fell 1.1%, led by losses in Commercial International Bank.

Markets in Bahrain, Oman and Kuwait also recorded modest declines.

The ongoing conflict has disrupted energy markets, with traffic through the Strait of Hormuz largely suspended. Brent crude rose 4.8% to $94.75 per barrel as investors assessed supply risks.

Analysts said higher oil prices could provide some support to Gulf economies despite market volatility.

The conflict, now in its eighth week, has intensified concerns over regional stability. The United States has warned of further escalation, while Iran has threatened retaliation against regional infrastructure if tensions increase.

Reports also indicated that the United Arab Emirates has begun discussions with the U.S. on potential financial support mechanisms should the situation deteriorate further, although this could not be independently verified.

Investors are expected to remain cautious in the near term, with market direction closely tied to developments in the geopolitical situation and energy markets.

OIC Economies
Pakistan repays $2 billion to UAE amid ongoing external financing pressures

Pakistan has repaid $2 billion to the United Arab Emirates under maturing bilateral deposits, as the country navigates external financing pressures and debt obligations, a central bank official said on Saturday.

The repayment forms part of a broader $3.5 billion due to the UAE by the end of April, as authorities work to stabilize foreign exchange reserves with support from allied countries and an International Monetary Fund (IMF) program.

The outflow comes at a time when Pakistan’s reserves remain under pressure. As of March 27, foreign exchange reserves stood at $16.4 billion, covering roughly three months of imports. The repayment coincided with $1.4 billion in Eurobond obligations during the same period, highlighting ongoing strain on the country’s balance of payments.

To manage liquidity, Pakistan has relied on financial support from partner countries. Earlier this week, Saudi Arabia deposited $2 billion with the State Bank of Pakistan and agreed to extend the maturity of a separate $3 billion deposit, providing short-term relief to reserves.

Pakistan has also received financial backing from China and other partners as it works to meet conditions under its $7 billion IMF programme, which requires maintaining adequate reserve levels.

Officials have previously described repayments to the UAE as routine transactions under bilateral agreements, although they come amid tighter external conditions and ongoing financing needs.

Looking ahead, Pakistan is exploring a mix of funding options, including Eurobonds, Islamic sukuk, commercial borrowing and bilateral support, to manage upcoming repayments and maintain reserve stability.

OIC Economies
Middle East growth hardest hit from Iran war, IMF says

Growth across the Middle East and North Africa region has bore the biggest brunt of the Iran conflict, significantly eroding regional output and progress. 

The MENA region’s growth is expected to slow down to 1.1% in 2026, from 3.2% last year, before recovering to 4.8% in 2027, as the region faces the most direct impact of the current war, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has estimated. The region's 2026 growth forecast has been lowered by 2.8 percentage points from the fund's January projections. 

For commodity exporters directly affected by the conflict, diminished production and exports imply a severe downward revision of GDP growth projections for 2026, the fund said in its latest World Economic Output (WEO) update released this week. 

“The contraction of GDP growth for 2026 is therefore more pronounced for Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Qatar and less significant for Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates," the IMF said in its report. 

"For all these economies, growth in 2027 is expected to rebound, based on the assumption that energy production and transportation are normalized over the next few months - an assumption that may need to be revised if the duration of the conflict extends and the degree of damage suffered gets reassessed.”

The fund lowered estimates for Saudi Arabia’s GDP forecast for 2026 by 1.4 percentage point relative to January, to 3.1%, while revising it upward by 0.9 percentage point, to 4.5% for 2027.

Iran is among the worst hit countries in terms of downward growth revision, with its economy revised downward by 7.2 percentage points compared to IMF's January estimate, to -6.1% before rising sharply to 3.2% in 2027. 

In Egypt, growth is projected to slow to 4.2% in 2026 and recover to 4.8% in 2027, a cumulative downward revision of 1.1 percentage points.

"For commodity importers in the MENA, the terms-of-trade shock from higher commodity prices contributes to a somewhat modest downward revision of growth projections in 2026 and 2027, with some differentiation as a result of varying exposures to imports of energy, energy derivatives, and food items, as well as different economic trajectories before the conflict erupted," the report read. 

The fund has estimated global and regional growth under several operating scenarios. Under the assumption that the conflict will be relatively short-lived, global growth is expected to slow down to 3.1% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027, down from 3.4% achieved last year. 

In case of a more protracted conflict, in which production and transport activities may take longer to resume than anticipated, the fund has taken two downside scenarios in consideration. 

In the adverse scenario - where oil prices would spike 80% and gas prices for Europe and Asia would rise 160% by the second quarter relative to the fund’s January baseline, as well as one-year-ahead inflation would soar by 50 basis points across advanced economies and 90 basis points in emerging markets by 2027 – global growth is estimated to drop to 2.5% in 2026 before rising to 3% next year. 

Global growth is estimated at 2% in 2026 and 2.2% in 2027 under a severe scenario in which oil prices would double while gas prices would rise 200% starting in the second quarter of 2026 relatively to the January WEO update baseline. Such a scenario would see one-year-ahead inflation spiking 100 basis points in advanced economies and 130 basis points in emerging markets by 2027. 

“The current hostilities in the Middle East pose immediate policy trade-offs: between fighting inflation and preserving growth and between supporting those affected by the rising cost of living and rebuilding fiscal buffers. Amid frequent global shocks, countries need to calibrate policies to ensure that they not only step up to the moment but also stand up to the next test,” the fund added. 

OIC Economies
UAE invests $95m in Türkiye at the start of year

The United Arab Emirates was among the top three investors in Türkiye at the beginning of the year. 

The Gulf state invested $95 million in the first two months of the year, behind Germany, which invested $198 million and the Netherlands that ploughed $118 million, state-run Anadolu Agency reported, citing data from the Association of International Investors. 

European Union (EU) countries accounted for 35% of inbound FDIs in February, which totalled $780 million. The UAE held the largest share by country at 18%, ahead of Singapore and the US at 15% each, Germany (14%) and Spain (9%).  

The recent injection helped drive total FDI inflows to more than $289 billion since 2003. EU countries were Turkiye’s biggest investors during the 2003-2025 period, constituting 59% of the total investor pool. 

FDI inflows to Türkiye stood at $10.4 billion in 2023, slipping from $13.4 billion received in 2022, according to UNCTAD's World Investment Report 2024.

“Türkiye’s investment climate is positively influenced by its favourable demographics and strategic geographical position, providing access to multiple regional markets, and has one of the most liberal legal regimes for FDI among OECD members,” according to Lloyds Bank. 

The country has adopted a series of legislative reforms to facilitate the reception of foreign investment, such as the creation of the Investment Office of the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, it added. 

Turkiye’s economy is projected to grow at 3.4% this year and 3.5% in 2027, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). 
The fund lowered Turkiye’s GDP forecast in its latest World Economic Outlook report, down 0.8 percentage points from its January 2026 WEO update.

The downward revision was due to weaker than expected growth in 2025, with high oil and gas prices weighing on economic activity. 
 

OIC Economies
Iran war may cost Arab countries up to $200 billion, says UN

Arab countries could suffer staggering losses of up to $200 billion due to the Iran conflict, according to a new United Nations study.  

The US-Israel war against Iran could cost Arab states between $120 billion to $194 billion in economic losses, new estimates by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) suggest.

Military escalation could wipe out between 3.7%-6% of the region’s collective gross domestic product (GDP). Coupled with an estimated loss of 3.6 million jobs - exceeding the ones created in the region last year - the reversal will cast up to 4 million people into poverty. 

The body said that it conducted five simulation scenarios, representing escalating levels of conflicts. The GCC countries and Levant subregions are expected to bear the brunt of the largest macroeconomic losses, with potential economic contractions of up to 8.5% and 8.7%, respectively. 

The crisis is expected to exacerbate poverty in the Levant region by 5%, edging an additional 2.85-3.30 million people into poverty - accounting for over 75 percent of the rise in poverty across the region. 

“This crisis rings alarm bells for countries of the region to fundamentally reevaluate their strategic choices of fiscal, sectoral, and social policies,” said Abdallah Al Dardari, UN assistant secretary general and regional bureau director for Arab States at UNDP. 

“Our findings underline the pressing need to strengthen regional collaboration to diversify economies - beyond reliance on growth driven by hydrocarbons, and to expand production bases, secure trade and logistics systems.” 

Qatar and Kuwait could witness a 14% contraction in their national outputs this year should the conflict continue through to the end of April, Bloomberg reported Goldman Sachs Group economist Farouk Soussa, as saying. 

It is a stark downgrade from the International Monetary Fund’s October estimates for both countries in the run-up to the conflict. The agency had projected Qatar’s GDP to grow by 6.1% in 2026 and Kuwait’s economy to expand by 3.8% this year.  

The conflict, now in its fifth week, has caused considerable damage to Iranian civilian and military architecture caused by the joint US-Israeli onslaught. The attacks also wiped out its top Iranian security and political echelons. 

Iran has carried out retaliatory attacks on its Gulf neighbours, causing substantial damage to airports, hotels, technology, and energy infrastructure as well as military bases. 

The repercussions are visible in global energy markets, with the crisis helping push Brent crude prices from roughly $72 per barrel to nearly $120 before easing slightly. 

The regional aviation industry has also felt the heat, with depressed travel demand and a lingering unease among travellers. 

“Since the escalation at end February 2026, the regional aviation network has shifted from an integrated commercial system to a set of restricted corridors, with several countries implementing partial or full airspace closures. As a result, global air cargo capacity on routes linking Asia, the Middle East, and Europe declined by nearly 40% between February 28 and March 3,” the study added. 
 


Most Viewed

Events & Courses

Special Coverage

Top 30 Business Schools of the Islamic Economy 2026

View all

30 Notable Islamic Fintechs - 2026

View all

30 Notable Islamic Fintechs - 2025

View all

Global Islamic Fintech Report 2025/26

View all

15 Most Active VCs in the Islamic Digital Economy

View all

State of the Global Islamic Economy (SGIE) 2024/25 Report

View all

Global Islamic Fintech Report 2024/25

View all

Top 30 Digital Islamic Economy Startups 2024

View all

Top 30 OIC Halal Products Companies 2023

View all

Gaza Crisis

View all

Global Islamic Fintech Report 2023/24

View all

The State of the Global Islamic Economy 2023/24 Report

View all

Global Islamic Fintech Report 2022

View all

State of the Global Islamic Economy 2022

View all

Food Security

View all

Women in the Islamic Economy

View all

COVID-19 and the Global Islamic Economy

View all

E-book: Impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak on Islamic finance in OIC countries

View all

State of the Global Islamic Economy 2020/21

View all

Global Islamic Fintech Report 2021

View all